Monday, October 31, 2016

Washington Post: Bipartisan Criticism of Comey Increases in DC

Outrage grows in Washington about FBI Director James Comey's unusual announcement of a renewed investigation of emails on Anthony Weiner's computer, says the Washington Post.


“On Monday, criticism of Comey continued to mount, notably from prominent former law enforcement officials. Democrats and Republicans alike on Capitol Hill amplified their demands that Comey and Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch provide a more detailed account of the investigation into the emails, which were found on a computer belonging to former congressman Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.) earlier this fall….


“Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa), chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, wrote Comey Monday saying that the disclosure provided to Congress last week “did not go far enough” and was unfair to Congress, the American people and Clinton.



“In the absence of additional, authoritative information from the FBI in the wake of your vague disclosure, Congress and the American people are left to sift through anonymous leaks from Justice Department officials to the press of varying levels of detail, reliability, and consistency,” Grassley wrote. “The American people deserve better than that.


”
The senator asked Comey to answer by Nov. 4 a series of questions about the discovery of the emails and what the FBI has learned about their contents.
Grassley's request adds to the increasing pressure on Comey to release more details and clarify his letter to Congress. A bipartisan group of about 100 former federal prosecutors and senior Justice Department officials have also called on Comey to release more information.




“We do not question Director Comey's motives,” wrote the group, which included President Obama's former attorney general, Eric H. Holder Jr., and former deputy attorney general Larry Thompson, who served under President George W. Bush.



“However, the fact remains that the Director's disclosure has invited considerable, uninformed public speculation about the significance of newly-discovered material just days before a national election,” the group wrote. “For this reason, we believe the American people deserve all the facts, and fairness dictates releasing information that provides a full and complete picture regarding the material at issue.”



Comey set off a firestorm Friday by telling the chairmen of eight congressional committees that the FBI would take “appropriate investigative steps” to determine whether newly discovered emails found in an unrelated investigation contain classified information and to assess whether they are relevant to the investigation involving Clinton's private email server. The unrelated case was an investigation of Weiner, who is accused of having explicit exchanges with a 15-year-old girl. Weiner is the estranged husband of top Clinton aide Huma Abedin.



Justice officials have said that before Comey notified Congress, they warned him that doing so would go against long-standing practices of the department not to comment on ongoing investigations and not to take steps that could be viewed as influencing an election.



“However, officials familiar with Comey's decision said that he felt a sense of obligation to lawmakers to “supplement” his testimony under oath in July that the Clinton investigation was complete and there would be no charges. Comey was also concerned that word of the new email discovery would leak to the media and raise questions of a coverup, the officials said.

Comey's disclosure about the Clinton probe is particularly striking, some U.S. officials said, because he had advised against the administration publicly accusing Russia of trying to meddle in the 2016 election because it would seem too political too close to Election Day. Comey eventually supported the administration's Oct. 7 denunciation, which alluded to hacks of Democratic Party organizations, as long as it did not have the FBI's name on it, officials said. His desire to keep the FBI out of the announcement stemmed from several concerns, including a wish not to appear biased as the bureau conducted a probe into Russian hacking, they said. Comey's position was first reported by CNBC.”


Donald Trump announced on the campaign trail that the FBI re-opened the investigation because they knew the emails demonstrated that Clinton had engaged in very serious criminal activity. He added that Clinton was so corrupt that she could not possibly be a role model for the nation's children.


Trump has dragged Clinton through the mud so often that he hopes some of the mud sticks. His comment about a “role model” reflects Trump's love of calling his opponent whatever he is called. With his long record of lies, fraud, and boasting, as well as his bragging about sexually assaulting women, no one would call him a role model.


Thursday, October 20, 2016

Mom's Corner – October 19, 2016

1.1 Article: “Better Than 'I Will Pray for You' ” 1.2 DIY Dry Erase Table 1.3 Kick the Can and Make Your Own Pumpkin Puree   1.1 Article: “Better Than 'I Will Pray for You' ” We all have the...

Wednesday, August 24, 2016

Hot Dogs, Anyone?

Check out the hot dog and slaw at Perly's!

Hot Dog and Slaw at Perly's

Delish! And don't forget - Perly's features cocktails and wine on tap!

Thursday, August 11, 2016

Kirk Confronts Loyalty vs. Responsibility in STAR TREK: “Where No Man Has Gone Before”

Television Series: Star Trek Episode #2-B: “Where No Man Has Gone Before” USA Airdate: September 22, 1966 (#3) Written By: Samuel A. Peeples Music Composed By: Alexander Courage Directed By: James Goldstone Running Time: 50 Minutes Rapid Reviewpoints Story: 10 (out of 10) Performances: 9 Visual Style: 10 Music: 10 Overall: 10 Verdict: Must See Comments: “Where No Man Has Gone Before” is a powerful, action-packed episode where Captain Kirk…Read more Kirk Confronts Loyalty vs. Responsibility in STAR TREK: “Where No Man Has Gone Before”

Wednesday, August 3, 2016

Kansas: GOP Moderates Defeat Far-Right Elected Officials

Good news from Kansas yesterday.


In the Republican primaries, several courageous moderate Republicans defeated far-right elected officials.


One of the major issues that helped the moderates was school funding.


Kansans are not ready to abandon public schools for the sake of Governor Brownback's tax cuts.


Friday, July 22, 2016

"One Love" with the Valentine



Show Richmond what family means to you with OutRVAthe Valentine, and photographer Michael Simon


Complete the online form to express your family's interest in being photographed for a new exhibition, One Love: LGBT Families, to be on view at the Valentine from December 1, 2016 - September 4, 2017.   Families may also be included in OutRVA tourism promotions.


Michael Simon will photograph selected families during Summer/Fall 2016.  


Participants will receive:


  • Free print of their portrait 

  • Family membership to the Valentine valued at $75

  • Richmond Region Tourism 2016 attraction pass valued at $600.

Participation is contingent on scheduling availability. All family members must sign a photo release form in order to participate. Submission deadline is August 1, 2016.






Sponsored by













  • The Valentine

  • Altria

  • Virginia Tourism Corporation

  • Richmond Region Tourism

  • Michael Simon Photography










Sponsorship opportunities still available. Please contact the Valentine at info@thevalentine.org






Friday, June 17, 2016

Success Academy Students Finally Gain Admission to Elite High Schools

Six eighth grade students at Eva Moskowitz's charter chain Success Academy passed the examination for New York City's elite high schools. This is the first time that any student from Success Academy has passed the rigorous exam in the three years that she had students in this grade.


Moskowitz offered this information in a meeting with the New York Daily News editorial board.


Six students out of 54 Success Academy eighth-graders who took the Specialized High Schools Admissions Test were offered seats in 2016 at one of the elite high schools that rely on the test, like Stuyvesant, Brooklyn Tech or Bronx Science, Moskowitz said in a wide-ranging interview with the Daily News Editorial Board.


That's up from zero kids who gained seats in 2014 and 2015.


The performance is below the city average acceptance rate of nearly 19%. However, all of the Success Academy kids who took the test and gained acceptance are black or Hispanic, making her acceptance rate of 11% about twice the citywide average for students of color. Only 4% of black students and 6% of Hispanic students who took the test got offers in 2016.


“It's a rigorous test, and the kids have to prepare for it,” Moskowitz said. “Truth be told, our kids, most of them did not study for it. They took it cold.”


Students who pass the difficult test often practice for months, and there's a cottage industry of prep firms that train kids specifically for the exam.


But Moskowitz said the Success Academy kids who got in did so without the drilling.


“I'm very proud of the fact that our kids are flexible thinkers,” Moskowitz said. “They have read a lot and done a lot of mathematics.”


Just under a quarter of Success Academy eighth-graders took the test, roughly the same as the city average for black and Hispanic kids.



Moskowitz says that the kids didn't take any practice tests, didn't drill, didn't need any extra help to get ready.


She makes it sound easy because all of her students are “flexible thinkers” who have done a lot of reading and mathematics.


But if this is so, why did only six of 54 students who took the test pass it? Why not all 54? The 54 are “just under a quarter” of the charter chain's eighth graders. Why didn't all 220 or so take the test and pass it? Aren't they all flexible thinkers who have done a lot of reading and mathematics? Shouldn't they all be able to sit for the exam without any preparation?


Bear in mind that the 220 who finished eighth grade are about 40% of those who started, reflecting a 60% attrition rate. With their “grit” and the academic prowess learned at SA charters, why were only six students able to pass the exams?


Stanford economist Caroline Hoxby wrote a study in 2009 that was widely hailed by charter advocates, claiming that students in NYC charters nearly closed the “Scarsdale-Harlem” achievement gap. The implication was that attendance in a charter school for eight years would raise the achievement of all charter students, not just six of 220, or even six of 54.